With
seven years of experience to back us, we at SmithDehn INDIA (formerly SDD
Global Solutions) know what we’re talking about when we insist that legal outsourcing
is a game changer for both lawyers as well as their clients -- and in the best
possible way.
A
couple of years ago, in our "Law Without Borders" blog, our President,
Russell Smith, wrote an article called "12
Ways Offshore Legal Outsourcing Could Shake Up the Law World in the Next
Decade."
Re-reading
the article, and considering recent developments, we still believe all 12 of
the predictions. The Western legal industry, despite all kinds of warnings and
economic slaps in the face, still has not fundamentally changed its inefficient
and outmoded model. But increasingly, and recently, many experts are
foretelling the demise of the law business as we know it. Quite a few are
predicting a dramatic further increase in the quantity and quality of offshore
legal outsourcing.
At
a major academic-sponsored conference in March of this year, called
"ReInvent Law," over 400 lawyers, professors, vendors, technologists,
and others gathered in California (and will do so again in New York and London)
to discuss "what everyone now accepts as conventional wisdom: 'There’s a
storm brewing,' across the legal landscape." "Whatever their other
ideas, speaker after speaker expressed certainty [that] clients were either
unhappy or unserved.'" The academic organizers of the conference noted
that "[t]echnology and legal process outsourcing companies are taking work
away from traditional law firms," "[t]he legal market is ready for
new providers who will look freshly at the problems," and “[w]e have a
delivery-of-services challenge -- We’re still struggling to provide affordable
and accessible services to this (vast) market.”
In
a report last September by the Outsourcing Unit of the London School of
Economics, entitled "Legal Process Outsourcing: LPO Provider
Landscape," in a section headed, "LPO
Providers Will Move Up The Value Chain," two experts in the field
concluded as follows:
"Like
ITO (Information Technology Outsourcing) and BPO (Business Process
Outsourcing), the initial driver of LPO (Legal Process Outsourcing) has been
lower
costs
available through labor arbitrage. Clients initially feel most comfortable sending
discrete work with low complexity and low criticality offshore, the so-called
'white chip' work. (In poker, tradition has it that white chips are the least
valuable, red chips are of medium value, and blue chips are most valuable.) If
LPO follows a path similar to ITO and BPO growth, the LPO market will move up
the value chain to include more red chip and even blue chip work."
Less
than a couple of months ago, in Managing Partner magazine, two former members
of mega-law-firm Linklaters wrote a provocative article with a correspondingly
alarmist title: "Prize
Fight: Get Ready To Face LPO Providers as Competitors." They made an interesting
analogy between music downloading, on the one hand, which amounted to only one
per cent of the music listening market before it almost destroyed the CD
industry, and "LSO" or Legal Services Outsourcing, on the other hand,
which has only a tiny share of the legal services market now, but easily could
challenge the pre-eminence of law firms if the latter do not change fast
enough:
"LSO [Legal Services
Outsourcing] has become a billion-dollar business that is set to quadruple,
some say, to $4bn per annum by about 2015. However, given that the total global
market for external legal advice is today estimated at roughly $500bn per
annum, a $1bn market share suggests that LSO providers currently occupy only
about 0.2 per cent of the market. Even were this to quadruple, by that logic,
more than 99 per cent of legal work would still go to ‘conventional’ law firms.
All of this sounds immensely comforting until one realizes that, at one time,
music streaming constituted only one per cent of a market dominated by CD
manufacturers and, before that, similar imbalances existed between CDs and LP
records. History is full of stories about leading businesses that could not
transform themselves in response to changes in the market and whose
pre-eminence was taken up by others.... There seems little doubt that we are
witnessing a similar phenomenon in the legal profession."